There is no single and generally accepted definition of the term “employee engagement”. Some academics and practitioners state that “employee engagement” is synonymous with terms like “job satisfaction” and “employee commitment”.
An employee may be “satisfied”, turn up to their 9-5 job and perform ok in that role, but is this really what we would expect from an employee who was “engaged”? What about someone we could describe as “committed”? Firstly, what are they committed to? They may do everything the “satisfied” employee does and even go a little further to push for that promotion or bonus. Would we describe this employee as an engaged employee? If so, then we are setting the bar too low
Gallup broadens the scope slightly by defining engaged employees as “those who are involved in, enthusiastic about and committed to their work and workplace.”
Others argue that term “employee engagement” is still much broader in scope and at Delphinium, we concur. Kevin Kruse’s definition is one that resonates with us: “Employee engagement is the emotional commitment the employee has to the organization and its goals.”
As Kruse’s definition is so broad, one could argue that it doesn’t really explain what “employee engagement” is. Therefore, we have set out some of the widely accepted characterises of employees who are said to be “engaged”:
What is clear is that employee engagement requires a two-way relationship between the employee and the organisation, to create and nurture engagement.
To discuss how you can improve employee engagement and arrange your free initial consultation contact us.
Did you find this article interesting? Sign up for our newsletter to receive articles in your inbox along with details of upcoming programs and events.